πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

G CainvsPreston

Analysis based on 5 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

4
Wins
0
Draws
1
Losses
βœ…FAVORABLE RECORD

βœ… FAVORABLE RECORD

This team has an above-average win rate when this referee officiates.

Bias Score
+35.0%
Matches Analyzed
5
βœ…

Favorable Pattern Detected

With a bias score of +35.0%, Preston has historically performed 35 percentage points better under G Cain than their average. This favorable pattern across 5 matches could be valuable information for match predictions and betting strategies.

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level+35.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

5 matches under this referee

3 Apr 2004
Bradford (H)
Championship
WIN
1 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Preston:
β€”
Bradford:
β€”
2 Nov 2002
Burnley (H)
Championship
WIN
3 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Preston:
🟨 1
Burnley:
🟨 1
1 Apr 2002
Barnsley (A)
Championship
LOSS
1 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Preston:
β€”
Barnsley:
🟨 1
26 Sept 2001
Norwich (H)
Championship
WIN
4 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Preston:
β€”
Norwich:
🟨 1
10 Nov 2000
Crewe (H)
Championship
WIN
2 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Preston:
β€”
Crewe:
🟨 2

When G Cain officiates Preston matches, the statistics reveal a significantly positive pattern. Based on 5 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Preston achieves a 80% win rate under G Cain, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 35.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)80.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score+35.0%

Cards for Preston

🟨 Yellows / Game0.20
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.00
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.