F GrahamvsReading
Analysis based on 7 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When F Graham officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 14.3% win rate under F Graham, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 30.7 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
🚨 STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -30.7%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 7 matches, Reading has won 31 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when F Graham is appointed.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
7 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2015 | Fulham(A) | 2 - 4 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 3 Fulham: 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 8 Mar 2014 | Brighton(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Reading: 🟨 3 Brighton: 🟨 2🟥 1 | Championship |
| 24 Mar 2012 | Blackpool(H) | 3 - 1 | WIN | Reading: — Blackpool: 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 27 Nov 2010 | Leeds(H) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | Reading: 🟨 3 Leeds: 🟨 4 | Championship |
| 7 Aug 2010 | Scunthorpe(H) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Reading: — Scunthorpe: 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 13 Apr 2010 | Newcastle(H) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 2 Newcastle: 🟨 3 | Championship |
| 17 Jan 2009 | Swansea(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 2🟥 1 Swansea: 🟨 1 | Championship |
When F Graham officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 14.3% win rate under F Graham, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 30.7 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Reading
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.