πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

E DuckworthvsWrexham

Analysis based on 5 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

3
Wins
1
Draws
1
Losses
βœ…FAVORABLE RECORD

βœ… FAVORABLE RECORD

This team has an above-average win rate when this referee officiates.

Bias Score
+15.0%
Matches Analyzed
5
βœ…

Favorable Pattern Detected

With a bias score of +15.0%, Wrexham has historically performed 15 percentage points better under E Duckworth than their average. This favorable pattern across 5 matches could be valuable information for match predictions and betting strategies.

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level+15.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

5 matches under this referee

11 Mar 2025
Reading (A)
League One
LOSS
0 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Wrexham:
β€”
Reading:
🟨 2πŸŸ₯ 1
9 Apr 2024
Crawley Town (H)
League Two
WIN
4 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Wrexham:
🟨 1
Crawley Town:
🟨 1
3 Dec 2022
York (A)
National League
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Wrexham:
🟨 1
York:
🟨 2
1 Nov 2022
Maidenhead (H)
National League
WIN
1 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Wrexham:
β€”
Maidenhead:
β€”
24 Sept 2022
Torquay (H)
National League
WIN
6 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Wrexham:
β€”
Torquay:
🟨 1

When E Duckworth officiates Wrexham matches, the statistics reveal a favorable pattern. Based on 5 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Wrexham achieves a 60% win rate under E Duckworth, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 15.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)60.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score+15.0%

Cards for Wrexham

🟨 Yellows / Game0.40
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.20
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.20

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.