πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

E DuckworthvsReading

Analysis based on 3 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

3
Wins
0
Draws
0
Losses
βœ…FAVORABLE RECORD

βœ… FAVORABLE RECORD

This team has an above-average win rate when this referee officiates.

Bias Score
+55.0%
Matches Analyzed
3
βœ…

Favorable Pattern Detected

With a bias score of +55.0%, Reading has historically performed 55 percentage points better under E Duckworth than their average. This favorable pattern across 3 matches could be valuable information for match predictions and betting strategies.

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level+55.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

3 matches under this referee

18 Dec 2025
Luton (H)
League One
WIN
3 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 2
Luton:
🟨 1
11 Mar 2025
Wrexham (H)
League One
WIN
2 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 2πŸŸ₯ 1
Wrexham:
β€”
19 Oct 2024
Crawley Town (H)
League One
WIN
4 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 1
Crawley Town:
🟨 2

When E Duckworth officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a significantly positive pattern. Based on 3 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 100% win rate under E Duckworth, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 55.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)100.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score+55.0%

Cards for Reading

🟨 Yellows / Game1.67
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.33

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.00
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.00
πŸ’°

Betting Outlook

TIPSTER INSIGHT
πŸŸ₯

RED CARD RISK

Red card frequency: 0.33 per game

Higher than average dismissal rate in this matchup.

⚠️ This is statistical analysis, not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.