D WhitestonevsCrystal Palace
Analysis based on 5 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When D Whitestone officiates Crystal Palace matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 5 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Crystal Palace achieves a 20% win rate under D Whitestone, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 25.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
π¨ STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -25.0%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 5 matches, Crystal Palace has won 25 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when D Whitestone is appointed.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
5 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Mar 2012 | Burnley(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Crystal Palace: π¨ 2π₯ 1 Burnley: π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 28 Aug 2010 | Scunthorpe(A) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | Crystal Palace: β Scunthorpe: β | Championship |
| 26 Apr 2010 | West Brom(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Crystal Palace: π¨ 1π₯ 1 West Brom: π¨ 5 | Championship |
| 17 Feb 2010 | Reading(H) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | Crystal Palace: π¨ 2 Reading: π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 25 Nov 2008 | Norwich(A) | 2 - 1 | WIN | Crystal Palace: π¨ 2 Norwich: β | Championship |
When D Whitestone officiates Crystal Palace matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 5 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Crystal Palace achieves a 20% win rate under D Whitestone, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 25.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Crystal Palace
Cards for Opponents
Betting Outlook
TIPSTER INSIGHTRED CARD RISK
Red card frequency: 0.4 per game
Higher than average dismissal rate in this matchup.
β οΈ This is statistical analysis, not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.