πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

D McdermidvsGillingham

Analysis based on 8 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

4
Wins
3
Draws
1
Losses
πŸ“ŠNO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

πŸ“Š NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.

Bias Score
+5.0%
Matches Analyzed
8

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level+5.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

8 matches under this referee

31 Mar 2012
Macclesfield (H)
League Two
WIN
2 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Gillingham:
🟨 1
Macclesfield:
🟨 2
16 Apr 2011
Morecambe (H)
League Two
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Gillingham:
🟨 1
Morecambe:
🟨 4
23 Nov 2010
Barnet (A)
League Two
WIN
2 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Gillingham:
🟨 1
Barnet:
🟨 1
28 Sept 2010
Southend (H)
League Two
DRAW
0 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Gillingham:
🟨 3
Southend:
🟨 1
20 Feb 2010
Bristol Rvs (H)
League One
WIN
1 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Gillingham:
🟨 2
Bristol Rvs:
🟨 2
22 Aug 2009
Hartlepool (H)
League One
LOSS
0 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Gillingham:
🟨 2
Hartlepool:
🟨 2
29 Sept 2007
Leeds (H)
League One
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Gillingham:
🟨 2
Leeds:
🟨 5πŸŸ₯ 2
4 Nov 2006
Chesterfield (H)
League One
WIN
2 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Gillingham:
β€”
Chesterfield:
🟨 2

When D Mcdermid officiates Gillingham matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 8 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Gillingham achieves a 50% win rate under D Mcdermid, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 5.0 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)50.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score+5.0%

Cards for Gillingham

🟨 Yellows / Game1.50
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game2.38
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.25

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.