πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

D DeadmanvsNott'm Forest

Analysis based on 10 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

3
Wins
4
Draws
3
Losses
⚠️POTENTIAL BIAS

⚠️ POTENTIAL BIAS DETECTED

This team performs notably worse under this referee compared to their overall average.

Bias Score
-15.0%
Matches Analyzed
10
⚠️

Notable Negative Pattern

With a bias score of -15.0%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 10 matches, Nott'm Forest has won 15 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when D Deadman is appointed.

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level-15.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

10 matches under this referee

13 Feb 2016
Huddersfield (H)
Championship
LOSS
0 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Nott'm Forest:
🟨 2
Huddersfield:
🟨 2
11 Apr 2015
Huddersfield (H)
Championship
LOSS
0 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Nott'm Forest:
β€”
Huddersfield:
🟨 1
17 Sept 2014
Fulham (H)
Championship
WIN
5 - 3
Cards Awarded:
Nott'm Forest:
🟨 2
Fulham:
🟨 6
18 Jan 2014
Blackburn (H)
Championship
WIN
4 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Nott'm Forest:
🟨 2
Blackburn:
🟨 2
3 Mar 2012
Barnsley (A)
Championship
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Nott'm Forest:
🟨 2
Barnsley:
🟨 2
29 Nov 2011
Leeds (H)
Championship
LOSS
0 - 4
Cards Awarded:
Nott'm Forest:
🟨 3πŸŸ₯ 1
Leeds:
β€”
22 Feb 2011
Preston (H)
Championship
DRAW
2 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Nott'm Forest:
🟨 4
Preston:
🟨 2
16 Jan 2010
Reading (H)
Championship
WIN
2 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Nott'm Forest:
🟨 1πŸŸ₯ 1
Reading:
🟨 1
7 Feb 2009
QPR (H)
Championship
DRAW
2 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Nott'm Forest:
🟨 4
QPR:
β€”
29 Jan 2008
Swansea (H)
League One
DRAW
0 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Nott'm Forest:
β€”
Swansea:
🟨 1

When D Deadman officiates Nott'm Forest matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 10 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Nott'm Forest achieves a 30% win rate under D Deadman, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 15.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)30.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-15.0%

Cards for Nott'm Forest

🟨 Yellows / Game2.00
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.20

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.70
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.00
πŸ’°

Betting Outlook

TIPSTER INSIGHT
πŸŸ₯

RED CARD RISK

Red card frequency: 0.2 per game

Higher than average dismissal rate in this matchup.

⚠️ This is statistical analysis, not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.