D BondvsReading
Analysis based on 18 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When D Bond officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 18 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 27.8% win rate under D Bond, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 17.2 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
β οΈ POTENTIAL BIAS DETECTED
This team performs notably worse under this referee compared to their overall average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -17.2%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 18 matches, Reading has won 17 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when D Bond is appointed.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
18 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Mar 2023 | Blackburn(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Reading: π¨ 2π₯ 1 Blackburn: π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 17 Feb 2023 | Cardiff(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Reading: π¨ 2 Cardiff: π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 14 Jan 2023 | QPR(H) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | Reading: π¨ 2 QPR: π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 4 Oct 2022 | Norwich(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Reading: π¨ 3 Norwich: π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 21 Nov 2020 | Bournemouth(A) | 2 - 4 | LOSS | Reading: π¨ 1 Bournemouth: π¨ 3 | Championship |
| 17 Oct 2020 | Middlesbrough(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | Reading: π¨ 3 Middlesbrough: π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 12 Sept 2020 | Derby(A) | 2 - 0 | WIN | Reading: π¨ 2 Derby: π¨ 3 | Championship |
| 11 Jul 2020 | Charlton(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | Reading: π¨ 3 Charlton: π¨ 4 | Championship |
| 26 Nov 2019 | Leeds(H) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Reading: π¨ 1 Leeds: π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 10 Nov 2018 | Ipswich(H) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | Reading: π¨ 1 Ipswich: π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 15 Sept 2018 | Preston(A) | 3 - 2 | WIN | Reading: π¨ 1 Preston: π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 3 Apr 2018 | Aston Villa(A) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | Reading: βπ₯ 1 Aston Villa: β | Championship |
| 20 Jan 2018 | Brentford(H) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Reading: π¨ 3 Brentford: π¨ 4 | Championship |
| 28 Nov 2017 | Barnsley(H) | 3 - 0 | WIN | Reading: β Barnsley: π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 11 Feb 2017 | Barnsley(H) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | Reading: π¨ 2 Barnsley: π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 13 Aug 2016 | Wolves(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | Reading: π¨ 2 Wolves: π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 14 Mar 2015 | Watford(A) | 1 - 4 | LOSS | Reading: β Watford: β | Championship |
| 30 Aug 2014 | Middlesbrough(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | Reading: π¨ 1 Middlesbrough: π¨ 2 | Championship |
When D Bond officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 18 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 27.8% win rate under D Bond, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 17.2 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Reading
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.