πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

C FoyvsReading

Analysis based on 13 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

2
Wins
3
Draws
8
Losses
🚨STRONG BIAS DETECTED

🚨 STRONG BIAS DETECTED

This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.

Bias Score
-29.6%
Matches Analyzed
13
⚠️

Notable Negative Pattern

With a bias score of -29.6%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 13 matches, Reading has won 30 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when C Foy is appointed.

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level-29.6%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

13 matches under this referee

30 Mar 2013
Arsenal (A)
Premier League
LOSS
1 - 4
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 1
Arsenal:
β€”
10 Nov 2012
Norwich (H)
Premier League
DRAW
0 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
β€”
Norwich:
🟨 1
22 Sept 2012
West Brom (A)
Premier League
LOSS
0 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
β€”
West Brom:
🟨 1
31 Mar 2012
West Ham (A)
Championship
WIN
4 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 1
West Ham:
🟨 2
2 Jan 2012
Cardiff (A)
Championship
LOSS
1 - 3
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 2
Cardiff:
β€”
25 Oct 2008
QPR (H)
Championship
DRAW
0 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 1
QPR:
🟨 1
12 Apr 2008
Fulham (H)
Premier League
LOSS
0 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
β€”
Fulham:
🟨 1
3 Mar 2007
Arsenal (A)
Premier League
LOSS
1 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 1
Arsenal:
🟨 1
9 Dec 2006
Watford (A)
Premier League
DRAW
0 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 1
Watford:
β€”
12 Feb 2005
Leeds (A)
Championship
LOSS
1 - 3
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 1
Leeds:
🟨 1
13 Dec 2003
Stoke (A)
Championship
LOSS
0 - 3
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
β€”
Stoke:
🟨 2
26 Oct 2002
Preston (A)
Championship
LOSS
0 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 5
Preston:
🟨 2
22 Sept 2001
Wycombe (H)
League One
WIN
2 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Reading:
🟨 5
Wycombe:
🟨 2πŸŸ₯ 1

When C Foy officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 13 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 15.4% win rate under C Foy, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 29.6 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)15.4%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-29.6%

Cards for Reading

🟨 Yellows / Game1.38
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.08
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.08

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.