C BoyesonvsShrewsbury
Analysis based on 23 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When C Boyeson officiates Shrewsbury matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 23 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Shrewsbury achieves a 21.7% win rate under C Boyeson, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 23.3 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
π¨ STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -23.3%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 23 matches, Shrewsbury has won 23 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when C Boyeson is appointed.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
23 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Apr 2023 | Peterboro(H) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | Shrewsbury: π¨ 2 Peterboro: π¨ 1 | League One |
| 29 Jan 2022 | AFC Wimbledon(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Shrewsbury: π¨ 2 AFC Wimbledon: π¨ 3 | League One |
| 23 Mar 2021 | Burton(A) | 2 - 1 | WIN | Shrewsbury: π¨ 2 Burton: β | League One |
| 1 Feb 2020 | Rochdale(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Shrewsbury: π¨ 1 Rochdale: β | League One |
| 21 Sept 2019 | Rotherham(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | Shrewsbury: π¨ 3 Rotherham: π¨ 1 | League One |
| 25 Aug 2018 | Luton(A) | 2 - 3 | LOSS | Shrewsbury: π¨ 1 Luton: π¨ 1 | League One |
| 17 Feb 2018 | Rotherham(H) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Shrewsbury: π¨ 1 Rotherham: π¨ 2 | League One |
| 14 Feb 2017 | Peterboro(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Shrewsbury: π¨ 2π₯ 1 Peterboro: π¨ 2 | League One |
| 12 Nov 2016 | Oxford(H) | 2 - 0 | WIN | Shrewsbury: π¨ 2 Oxford: π¨ 1 | League One |
| 13 Feb 2016 | Blackpool(A) | 3 - 2 | WIN | Shrewsbury: π¨ 1 Blackpool: π¨ 1 | League One |
| 7 Feb 2015 | Southend(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Shrewsbury: π¨ 1 Southend: π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 16 Nov 2013 | Port Vale(A) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | Shrewsbury: π¨ 1 Port Vale: π¨ 2 | League One |
| 21 Apr 2012 | Accrington(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Shrewsbury: β Accrington: π¨ 2 | League Two |
| 14 Jan 2012 | Gillingham(H) | 2 - 0 | WIN | Shrewsbury: π¨ 2 Gillingham: π¨ 2 | League Two |
| 15 Oct 2011 | Crawley Town(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Shrewsbury: β Crawley Town: β | League Two |
| 10 Apr 2010 | Crewe(A) | 3 - 0 | WIN | Shrewsbury: π¨ 1 Crewe: π¨ 2 | League Two |
| 21 Oct 2008 | Accrington(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Shrewsbury: π¨ 1 Accrington: π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 22 Mar 2008 | Dag and Red(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Shrewsbury: β Dag and Red: π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 24 Nov 2007 | Rotherham(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | Shrewsbury: β Rotherham: β | League Two |
| 30 Sept 2006 | Rochdale(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Shrewsbury: π¨ 1 Rochdale: π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 10 Dec 2005 | Boston(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Shrewsbury: π¨ 1 Boston: π¨ 4π₯ 1 | League Two |
| 23 Oct 2004 | Southend(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Shrewsbury: π¨ 4 Southend: π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 25 Mar 2003 | Torquay(H) | 2 - 3 | LOSS | Shrewsbury: π¨ 2 Torquay: π¨ 5 | League Two |
When C Boyeson officiates Shrewsbury matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 23 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Shrewsbury achieves a 21.7% win rate under C Boyeson, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 23.3 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Shrewsbury
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.