A WoolmervsReading
Analysis based on 20 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When A Woolmer officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 20 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 40% win rate under A Woolmer, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 5.0 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
π NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS
Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
20 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Mar 2022 | Millwall(H) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | Reading: π¨ 2 Millwall: π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 20 Nov 2021 | Nott'm Forest(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Reading: π¨ 4 Nott'm Forest: π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 17 Aug 2021 | Bristol City(H) | 2 - 3 | LOSS | Reading: β Bristol City: π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 17 Mar 2021 | Birmingham(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Reading: β Birmingham: π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 13 Feb 2021 | Millwall(H) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Reading: β Millwall: π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 14 Jul 2020 | Middlesbrough(H) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Reading: π¨ 2 Middlesbrough: β | Championship |
| 15 Feb 2020 | Sheffield Weds(A) | 3 - 0 | WIN | Reading: π¨ 2 Sheffield Weds: βπ₯ 1 | Championship |
| 9 Nov 2019 | Luton(H) | 3 - 0 | WIN | Reading: β Luton: π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 1 Oct 2019 | Fulham(H) | 1 - 4 | LOSS | Reading: π¨ 1π₯ 1 Fulham: β | Championship |
| 19 Jan 2019 | Derby(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Reading: π¨ 1 Derby: π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 18 Oct 2016 | Aston Villa(H) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | Reading: π¨ 1 Aston Villa: π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 27 Aug 2016 | Cardiff(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | Reading: β Cardiff: β | Championship |
| 23 Aug 2014 | Nott'm Forest(A) | 0 - 4 | LOSS | Reading: π¨ 1 Nott'm Forest: π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 8 Apr 2014 | Bournemouth(A) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | Reading: π¨ 1 Bournemouth: π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 29 Nov 2011 | Peterboro(H) | 3 - 2 | WIN | Reading: π¨ 3 Peterboro: π¨ 3 | Championship |
| 29 Oct 2011 | Crystal Palace(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | Reading: π¨ 4 Crystal Palace: π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 12 Apr 2011 | Scunthorpe(A) | 2 - 0 | WIN | Reading: π¨ 4 Scunthorpe: π¨ 5 | Championship |
| 5 Apr 2010 | Coventry(H) | 3 - 0 | WIN | Reading: π¨ 2 Coventry: π¨ 4 | Championship |
| 16 Sept 2008 | Sheffield Weds(H) | 6 - 0 | WIN | Reading: β Sheffield Weds: π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 17 Sept 2005 | Crewe(H) | 1 - 0 | WIN | Reading: β Crewe: β | Championship |
When A Woolmer officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 20 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 40% win rate under A Woolmer, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 5.0 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Reading
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.