A TaylorvsReading
Analysis based on 8 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When A Taylor officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 8 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 12.5% win rate under A Taylor, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 32.5 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
🚨 STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -32.5%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 8 matches, Reading has won 33 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when A Taylor is appointed.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
8 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 Apr 2014 | Doncaster(A) | 3 - 1 | WIN | Reading: — Doncaster: — | Championship |
| 9 Nov 2013 | QPR(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Reading: 🟨 1 QPR: 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 2 Mar 2013 | Everton(A) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 1 Everton: 🟨 1 | Premier League |
| 17 Dec 2012 | Arsenal(H) | 2 - 5 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 1 Arsenal: 🟨 1 | Premier League |
| 1 Oct 2011 | Middlesbrough(H) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | Reading: — Middlesbrough: 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 17 Oct 2009 | West Brom(A) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | Reading: 🟨 1 West Brom: 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 15 Aug 2009 | Newcastle(A) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | Reading: — Newcastle: 🟨 3 | Championship |
| 10 Mar 2009 | Charlton(H) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | Reading: 🟨 2 Charlton: 🟨 1 | Championship |
When A Taylor officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 8 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 12.5% win rate under A Taylor, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 32.5 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Reading
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.