πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

A PennvsRotherham

Analysis based on 6 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

3
Wins
2
Draws
1
Losses
πŸ“ŠNO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

πŸ“Š NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.

Bias Score
+5.0%
Matches Analyzed
6

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level+5.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

6 matches under this referee

20 Dec 2008
Accrington (A)
League Two
WIN
3 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Rotherham:
🟨 1
Accrington:
β€”
12 Apr 2008
Grimsby (A)
League Two
WIN
1 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Rotherham:
🟨 1
Grimsby:
🟨 1
9 Feb 2008
Milton Keynes Dons (A)
League Two
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Rotherham:
🟨 1
Milton Keynes Dons:
β€”
30 Dec 2006
Leyton Orient (H)
League One
DRAW
2 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Rotherham:
β€”
Leyton Orient:
🟨 2
18 Feb 2006
Swindon (A)
League One
WIN
3 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Rotherham:
🟨 1
Swindon:
β€”
9 Apr 2005
Preston (H)
Championship
LOSS
1 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Rotherham:
🟨 3
Preston:
🟨 1

When A Penn officiates Rotherham matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 6 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Rotherham achieves a 50% win rate under A Penn, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 5.0 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)50.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score+5.0%

Cards for Rotherham

🟨 Yellows / Game1.17
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game0.67
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.