πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

A JacksonvsChorley

Analysis based on 4 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

1
Wins
0
Draws
3
Losses
🚨STRONG BIAS DETECTED

🚨 STRONG BIAS DETECTED

This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.

Bias Score
-20.0%
Matches Analyzed
4
⚠️

Notable Negative Pattern

With a bias score of -20.0%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 4 matches, Chorley has won 20 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when A Jackson is appointed.

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level-20.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

4 matches under this referee

3 Mar 2020
Eastleigh (H)
National League
LOSS
1 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Chorley:
🟨 3
Eastleigh:
🟨 2
1 Jan 2020
Wrexham (H)
National League
LOSS
0 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Chorley:
🟨 3
Wrexham:
🟨 1
30 Nov 2019
Dag and Red (H)
National League
WIN
1 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Chorley:
🟨 2
Dag and Red:
β€”
26 Aug 2019
Notts County (A)
National League
LOSS
1 - 5
Cards Awarded:
Chorley:
β€”πŸŸ₯ 1
Notts County:
β€”

When A Jackson officiates Chorley matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 4 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Chorley achieves a 25% win rate under A Jackson, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 20.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)25.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-20.0%

Cards for Chorley

🟨 Yellows / Game2.00
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.25

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game0.75
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.00
πŸ’°

Betting Outlook

TIPSTER INSIGHT
πŸŸ₯

RED CARD RISK

Red card frequency: 0.25 per game

Higher than average dismissal rate in this matchup.

⚠️ This is statistical analysis, not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.