πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

A HallvsPeterboro

Analysis based on 11 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

1
Wins
4
Draws
6
Losses
🚨STRONG BIAS DETECTED

🚨 STRONG BIAS DETECTED

This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.

Bias Score
-35.9%
Matches Analyzed
11
⚠️

Notable Negative Pattern

With a bias score of -35.9%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 11 matches, Peterboro has won 36 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when A Hall is appointed.

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level-35.9%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

11 matches under this referee

8 Dec 2009
Ipswich (A)
Championship
DRAW
0 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Peterboro:
🟨 1
Ipswich:
β€”
29 Sept 2009
Plymouth (H)
Championship
LOSS
1 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Peterboro:
🟨 1
Plymouth:
🟨 2
30 Aug 2008
Hartlepool (H)
League One
LOSS
1 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Peterboro:
🟨 2
Hartlepool:
🟨 2
27 Oct 2007
Hereford (H)
League Two
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Peterboro:
🟨 1
Hereford:
🟨 3
20 Feb 2007
Boston (H)
League Two
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Peterboro:
🟨 1
Boston:
🟨 5
2 Sept 2005
Rushden & D (A)
League Two
WIN
2 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Peterboro:
🟨 1
Rushden & D:
🟨 4πŸŸ₯ 2
18 Mar 2005
Tranmere (A)
League One
LOSS
0 - 5
Cards Awarded:
Peterboro:
β€”
Tranmere:
β€”
25 Sept 2004
Luton (A)
League One
LOSS
1 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Peterboro:
🟨 2
Luton:
🟨 1
21 Apr 2003
Cheltenham (A)
League One
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Peterboro:
🟨 1
Cheltenham:
🟨 1
1 Jan 2003
QPR (H)
League One
LOSS
0 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Peterboro:
🟨 2
QPR:
🟨 2
28 Aug 2000
Swansea (H)
League One
LOSS
0 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Peterboro:
🟨 2
Swansea:
🟨 1

When A Hall officiates Peterboro matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 11 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Peterboro achieves a 9.1% win rate under A Hall, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 35.9 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)9.1%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-35.9%

Cards for Peterboro

🟨 Yellows / Game1.27
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.91
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.18

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.