πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

A DalevsMaidstone

Analysis based on 5 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

3
Wins
2
Draws
0
Losses
βœ…FAVORABLE RECORD

βœ… FAVORABLE RECORD

This team has an above-average win rate when this referee officiates.

Bias Score
+15.0%
Matches Analyzed
5
βœ…

Favorable Pattern Detected

With a bias score of +15.0%, Maidstone has historically performed 15 percentage points better under A Dale than their average. This favorable pattern across 5 matches could be valuable information for match predictions and betting strategies.

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level+15.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

5 matches under this referee

13 Sept 2022
Wealdstone (H)
National League
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Maidstone:
🟨 1
Wealdstone:
β€”
9 Apr 2019
Barnet (H)
National League
WIN
2 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Maidstone:
🟨 1
Barnet:
🟨 2
4 Aug 2018
Hartlepool (H)
National League
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Maidstone:
β€”
Hartlepool:
🟨 1
14 Apr 2018
Fylde (H)
National League
WIN
1 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Maidstone:
🟨 1
Fylde:
🟨 1
9 Sept 2017
Woking (H)
National League
WIN
3 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Maidstone:
🟨 1
Woking:
🟨 3

When A Dale officiates Maidstone matches, the statistics reveal a favorable pattern. Based on 5 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Maidstone achieves a 60% win rate under A Dale, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 15.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)60.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score+15.0%

Cards for Maidstone

🟨 Yellows / Game0.80
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.40
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.