A ByrnevsExeter
Analysis based on 1 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When A Byrne officiates Exeter matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 1 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Exeter achieves a 0% win rate under A Byrne, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 45.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
π¨ STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -45.0%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 1 matches, Exeter has won 45 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when A Byrne is appointed.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
1 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 Jan 2026 | Huddersfield(A) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | Exeter: π¨ 1 Huddersfield: π¨ 1 | League One |
When A Byrne officiates Exeter matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 1 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Exeter achieves a 0% win rate under A Byrne, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 45.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Exeter
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.