A BatesvsHull
Analysis based on 7 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When A Bates officiates Hull matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Hull achieves a 28.6% win rate under A Bates, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 16.4 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
β οΈ POTENTIAL BIAS DETECTED
This team performs notably worse under this referee compared to their overall average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -16.4%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 7 matches, Hull has won 16 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when A Bates is appointed.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
7 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Feb 2012 | Bristol City(H) | 3 - 0 | WIN | Hull: π¨ 1 Bristol City: π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 28 Sept 2010 | Burnley(A) | 0 - 4 | LOSS | Hull: π¨ 1 Burnley: β | Championship |
| 22 Dec 2007 | Charlton(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Hull: π¨ 4 Charlton: π¨ 1π₯ 1 | Championship |
| 17 Mar 2007 | Sunderland(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | Hull: π¨ 1 Sunderland: β | Championship |
| 4 Nov 2006 | Southampton(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | Hull: π¨ 2 Southampton: π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 22 Apr 2006 | Preston(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | Hull: β Preston: π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 11 Aug 2001 | Exeter(A) | 3 - 1 | WIN | Hull: π¨ 1 Exeter: π¨ 1 | League Two |
When A Bates officiates Hull matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Hull achieves a 28.6% win rate under A Bates, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 16.4 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Hull
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.