πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

A BatesvsCheltenham

Analysis based on 7 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

3
Wins
2
Draws
2
Losses
πŸ“ŠNO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

πŸ“Š NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.

Bias Score
-2.1%
Matches Analyzed
7

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level-2.1%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

7 matches under this referee

22 Feb 2011
Torquay (H)
League Two
DRAW
2 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Cheltenham:
β€”
Torquay:
🟨 4
20 Feb 2010
Morecambe (H)
League Two
WIN
2 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Cheltenham:
🟨 1
Morecambe:
🟨 1
20 Jan 2007
Gillingham (H)
League One
DRAW
1 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Cheltenham:
β€”
Gillingham:
🟨 2πŸŸ₯ 1
31 Dec 2005
Shrewsbury (H)
League Two
WIN
1 - 0
Cards Awarded:
Cheltenham:
🟨 2
Shrewsbury:
🟨 1
26 Nov 2004
Darlington (H)
League Two
LOSS
0 - 2
Cards Awarded:
Cheltenham:
β€”
Darlington:
🟨 4
16 Aug 2003
Swansea (H)
League Two
LOSS
3 - 4
Cards Awarded:
Cheltenham:
🟨 2
Swansea:
🟨 3
30 Mar 2002
Scunthorpe (A)
League Two
WIN
2 - 1
Cards Awarded:
Cheltenham:
🟨 4
Scunthorpe:
β€”

When A Bates officiates Cheltenham matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Cheltenham achieves a 42.9% win rate under A Bates, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 2.1 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)42.9%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-2.1%

Cards for Cheltenham

🟨 Yellows / Game1.29
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game2.14
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.14

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.