🧑‍⚖️ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

T ParkesvsRushden & D

Analysis based on 7 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

2
Wins
1
Draws
4
Losses

When T Parkes officiates Rushden & D matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Rushden & D achieves a 28.6% win rate under T Parkes, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 16.4 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

⚠️POTENTIAL BIAS

⚠️ POTENTIAL BIAS DETECTED

This team performs notably worse under this referee compared to their overall average.

Bias Score
-16.4%
Matches Analyzed
7
⚠️

Notable Negative Pattern

With a bias score of -16.4%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 7 matches, Rushden & D has won 16 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when T Parkes is appointed.

The Bias Meter™

Bias Level-16.4%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

7 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
14 Jan 2006Wrexham(H)0 - 2LOSS
League Two
6 Aug 2005Darlington(H)1 - 1DRAW
🟨 2
League Two
15 Jan 2005Cheltenham(A)1 - 4LOSS
🟨 1
League Two
1 Jan 2005Southend(A)0 - 3LOSS
🟨 2
League Two
7 Feb 2004Swindon(A)2 - 4LOSS
🟨 1
League One
21 Apr 2003Macclesfield(H)3 - 0WIN
League Two
7 Sept 2002Southend(H)3 - 0WIN
League Two

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)28.6%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-16.4%

Cards for Rushden & D

🟨 Yellows / Game0.86
🟥 Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.00
🟥 Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.