🧑‍⚖️ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

T NieldvsLincoln

Analysis based on 15 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

5
Wins
8
Draws
2
Losses

When T Nield officiates Lincoln matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 15 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Lincoln achieves a 33.3% win rate under T Nield, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 11.7 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

⚠️POTENTIAL BIAS

⚠️ POTENTIAL BIAS DETECTED

This team performs notably worse under this referee compared to their overall average.

Bias Score
-11.7%
Matches Analyzed
15

The Bias Meter™

Bias Level-11.7%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

15 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
16 Sept 2023Carlisle(H)1 - 1DRAW
🟨 1
League One
10 Apr 2023Plymouth(A)2 - 0WIN
🟨 3
League One
17 Sept 2022Bristol Rvs(A)6 - 3WIN
League One
11 Dec 2021Cheltenham(A)2 - 2DRAW
🟨 2
League One
22 Feb 2020Gillingham(H)0 - 0DRAW
🟨 3🟥 1
League One
22 Oct 2019Portsmouth(A)0 - 1LOSS
League One
30 Mar 2018Exeter(H)3 - 2WIN
🟨 1
League Two
20 Jan 2018Barnet(A)1 - 1DRAW
🟨 1
League Two
2 Sept 2017Luton(H)0 - 0DRAW
League Two
22 Apr 2017Macclesfield(H)2 - 1WIN
🟨 1
EC
22 Oct 2016Eastleigh(H)0 - 0DRAW
🟨 1
EC
13 Sept 2016Solihull(H)0 - 0DRAW
🟨 1
EC
16 Apr 2016Southport(A)2 - 2DRAW
EC
16 Jan 2016Forest Green(H)0 - 1LOSS
🟨 3
EC
10 Oct 2015Chester(A)3 - 2WIN
🟨 2
EC

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)33.3%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-11.7%

Cards for Lincoln

🟨 Yellows / Game1.27
🟥 Reds / Game0.07

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game2.27
🟥 Opp Reds / Game0.13

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.