πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

S TannervsReading

Analysis based on 11 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

6
Wins
1
Draws
4
Losses

When S Tanner officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 11 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 54.5% win rate under S Tanner, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 9.5 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

πŸ“ŠNO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

πŸ“Š NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.

Bias Score
+9.5%
Matches Analyzed
11

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level+9.5%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

11 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
19 Mar 2011Barnsley(A)1 - 0WIN
🟨 1
Championship
6 Nov 2010QPR(A)1 - 3LOSS
🟨 3
Championship
22 Dec 2007Sunderland(H)2 - 1WIN
β€”
Premier League
24 Nov 2007Man City(A)1 - 2LOSS
🟨 2
Premier League
15 Sept 2007Sunderland(A)1 - 2LOSS
🟨 2
Premier League
23 Dec 2006Everton(H)0 - 2LOSS
β€”
Premier League
11 Mar 2006Watford(H)0 - 0DRAW
🟨 2
Championship
26 Dec 2005Wolves(A)2 - 0WIN
β€”
Championship
16 Oct 2005Ipswich(H)2 - 0WIN
β€”
Championship
20 Aug 2005Millwall(H)5 - 0WIN
🟨 1
Championship
16 Apr 2005Nott'm Forest(H)1 - 0WIN
🟨 1
Championship

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)54.5%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score+9.5%

Cards for Reading

🟨 Yellows / Game1.09
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.73
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.27

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.