S MathiesonvsPlymouth
Analysis based on 9 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When S Mathieson officiates Plymouth matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 9 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Plymouth achieves a 22.2% win rate under S Mathieson, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 22.8 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
π¨ STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -22.8%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 9 matches, Plymouth has won 23 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when S Mathieson is appointed.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
9 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 Apr 2014 | Newport County(A) | 2 - 1 | WIN | β | League Two |
| 19 Oct 2013 | Hartlepool(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 14 Apr 2012 | Swindon(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | π¨ 2 | League Two |
| 5 Apr 2010 | Middlesbrough(H) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 19 Sept 2009 | Newcastle(A) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | π¨ 3 | Championship |
| 1 Nov 2008 | Sheffield United(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | π¨ 2 | Championship |
| 7 Apr 2007 | Leeds(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 10 Dec 2005 | Watford(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | π¨ 1 | Championship |
| 28 Feb 2004 | Blackpool(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | π¨ 2 | League One |
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Plymouth
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.