🧑‍⚖️ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

S MartinvsMorecambe

Analysis based on 7 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

2
Wins
3
Draws
2
Losses

When S Martin officiates Morecambe matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Morecambe achieves a 28.6% win rate under S Martin, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 16.4 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

⚠️POTENTIAL BIAS

⚠️ POTENTIAL BIAS DETECTED

This team performs notably worse under this referee compared to their overall average.

Bias Score
-16.4%
Matches Analyzed
7
⚠️

Notable Negative Pattern

With a bias score of -16.4%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 7 matches, Morecambe has won 16 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when S Martin is appointed.

The Bias Meter™

Bias Level-16.4%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

7 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
28 Feb 2017Portsmouth(A)1 - 1DRAW
🟨 1
League Two
11 Apr 2015Portsmouth(H)3 - 1WIN
League Two
31 Oct 2014Accrington(A)1 - 2LOSS
🟨 3
League Two
16 Sept 2014Mansfield(A)0 - 1LOSS
🟨 2
League Two
26 Apr 2014AFC Wimbledon(A)3 - 0WIN
🟨 1
League Two
26 Nov 2013York(H)0 - 0DRAW
🟨 2
League Two
5 Feb 2011Cheltenham(H)1 - 1DRAW
League Two

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)28.6%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-16.4%

Cards for Morecambe

🟨 Yellows / Game1.29
🟥 Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.14
🟥 Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.