S MartinvsLeeds
Analysis based on 11 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When S Martin officiates Leeds matches, the statistics reveal a significantly positive pattern. Based on 11 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Leeds achieves a 81.8% win rate under S Martin, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 36.8 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
✅ FAVORABLE RECORD
This team has an above-average win rate when this referee officiates.
Favorable Pattern Detected
With a bias score of +36.8%, Leeds has historically performed 37 percentage points better under S Martin than their average. This favorable pattern across 11 matches could be valuable information for match predictions and betting strategies.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
11 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 Dec 2024 | Stoke(A) | 2 - 0 | WIN | — | Championship |
| 1 Oct 2024 | Norwich(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | 🟨 4 | Championship |
| 17 Mar 2024 | Millwall(H) | 2 - 0 | WIN | 🟨 3 | Championship |
| 2 Feb 2024 | Bristol City(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | — | Championship |
| 23 Dec 2023 | Ipswich(H) | 4 - 0 | WIN | 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 20 Sept 2023 | Hull(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | 🟨 2🟥 1 | Championship |
| 26 Dec 2018 | Blackburn(H) | 3 - 2 | WIN | 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 21 Apr 2018 | Barnsley(H) | 2 - 1 | WIN | 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 23 Dec 2017 | Hull(H) | 1 - 0 | WIN | — | Championship |
| 2 Jan 2017 | Rotherham(H) | 3 - 0 | WIN | 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 24 Sept 2016 | Ipswich(H) | 1 - 0 | WIN | — | Championship |
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Leeds
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.