🧑‍⚖️ Referee Analysis

S CopelandvsChesterfield

Analysis based on 10 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

7
Wins
1
Draws
2
Losses

When S Copeland officiates Chesterfield matches, the statistics reveal a significantly positive pattern. Based on 10 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Chesterfield achieves a 70% win rate under S Copeland, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 25.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

FAVORABLE RECORD

✅ FAVORABLE RECORD

This team has an above-average win rate when this referee officiates.

Bias Score
+25.0%
Matches Analyzed
10

Favorable Pattern Detected

With a bias score of +25.0%, Chesterfield has historically performed 25 percentage points better under S Copeland than their average. This favorable pattern across 10 matches could be valuable information for match predictions and betting strategies.

The Bias Meter™

Bias Level+25.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

10 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
23 Aug 2025Harrogate(A)2 - 1WIN
🟨 1
League Two
23 Nov 2024Barrow(H)1 - 0WIN
🟨 2
League Two
23 Mar 2024Boreham Wood(H)3 - 0WIN
🟨 1
EC
9 Sept 2023Dag and Red(H)3 - 1WIN
EC
18 Apr 2023Torquay(H)5 - 1WIN
EC
24 Jan 2023Altrincham(H)1 - 0WIN
🟨 1
EC
16 Aug 2022Wrexham(H)2 - 0WIN
🟨 1
EC
25 Sept 2021Torquay(H)2 - 2DRAW
🟨 1
EC
6 Oct 2020Hartlepool(H)1 - 2LOSS
🟨 2🟥 1
EC
7 Dec 2019Bromley(H)1 - 2LOSS
🟨 1
EC

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)70.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score+25.0%

Cards for Chesterfield

🟨 Yellows / Game1.00
🟥 Reds / Game0.10

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.60
🟥 Opp Reds / Game0.10

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.