🧑‍⚖️ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

S BennettvsReading

Analysis based on 7 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

2
Wins
2
Draws
3
Losses

When S Bennett officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 28.6% win rate under S Bennett, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 16.4 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

⚠️POTENTIAL BIAS

⚠️ POTENTIAL BIAS DETECTED

This team performs notably worse under this referee compared to their overall average.

Bias Score
-16.4%
Matches Analyzed
7
⚠️

Notable Negative Pattern

With a bias score of -16.4%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 7 matches, Reading has won 16 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when S Bennett is appointed.

The Bias Meter™

Bias Level-16.4%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

7 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
19 Jan 2008Man United(H)0 - 2LOSS
🟨 1
Premier League
18 Aug 2007Everton(H)1 - 0WIN
🟨 2
Premier League
17 Mar 2007Portsmouth(H)0 - 0DRAW
🟨 1
Premier League
30 Jan 2007Wigan(H)3 - 2WIN
🟨 1
Premier League
1 Jan 2005Gillingham(A)0 - 0DRAW
Championship
4 Dec 2004Wolves(A)1 - 4LOSS
🟨 1
Championship
18 Sept 2002Norwich(H)0 - 2LOSS
🟨 5🟥 1
Championship

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)28.6%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-16.4%

Cards for Reading

🟨 Yellows / Game1.57
🟥 Reds / Game0.14

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.00
🟥 Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.