🧑‍⚖️ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

R StylesvsReading

Analysis based on 7 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

2
Wins
2
Draws
3
Losses

When R Styles officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 28.6% win rate under R Styles, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 16.4 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

⚠️POTENTIAL BIAS

⚠️ POTENTIAL BIAS DETECTED

This team performs notably worse under this referee compared to their overall average.

Bias Score
-16.4%
Matches Analyzed
7
⚠️

Notable Negative Pattern

With a bias score of -16.4%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 7 matches, Reading has won 16 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when R Styles is appointed.

The Bias Meter™

Bias Level-16.4%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

7 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
12 Nov 2007Arsenal(H)1 - 3LOSS
🟨 1
Premier League
12 Aug 2007Man United(A)0 - 0DRAW
🟨 2🟥 1
Premier League
6 Dec 2006Newcastle(A)2 - 3LOSS
🟨 1
Premier League
12 Nov 2006Tottenham(H)3 - 1WIN
🟨 1
Premier League
30 Apr 2005Wolves(H)1 - 2LOSS
🟨 1
Championship
21 Feb 2004Gillingham(A)1 - 0WIN
🟨 2
Championship
28 Sept 2002Stoke(H)1 - 1DRAW
🟨 2
Championship

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)28.6%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-16.4%

Cards for Reading

🟨 Yellows / Game1.43
🟥 Reds / Game0.14

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.14
🟥 Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.