🧑‍⚖️ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

R EastvsReading

Analysis based on 6 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

2
Wins
1
Draws
3
Losses

When R East officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 6 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 33.3% win rate under R East, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 11.7 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

⚠️POTENTIAL BIAS

⚠️ POTENTIAL BIAS DETECTED

This team performs notably worse under this referee compared to their overall average.

Bias Score
-11.7%
Matches Analyzed
6

The Bias Meter™

Bias Level-11.7%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

6 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
18 Nov 2017Wolves(H)0 - 2LOSS
🟨 2
Championship
2 Jan 2017Bristol City(A)3 - 2WIN
🟨 3
Championship
11 Sept 2015Ipswich(H)5 - 1WIN
Championship
4 Oct 2014Brentford(A)1 - 3LOSS
🟨 3
Championship
20 Oct 2012Liverpool(A)0 - 1LOSS
🟨 1
Premier League
18 Oct 2011Derby(H)2 - 2DRAW
🟨 1
Championship

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)33.3%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-11.7%

Cards for Reading

🟨 Yellows / Game1.67
🟥 Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game2.17
🟥 Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.