R BeebyvsSheffield Weds
Analysis based on 9 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When R Beeby officiates Sheffield Weds matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 9 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Sheffield Weds achieves a 11.1% win rate under R Beeby, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 33.9 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
🚨 STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -33.9%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 9 matches, Sheffield Weds has won 34 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when R Beeby is appointed.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
9 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 Nov 2007 | QPR(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 11 Aug 2007 | Ipswich(A) | 1 - 4 | LOSS | 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 18 Oct 2006 | Colchester(A) | 0 - 4 | LOSS | 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 9 Sept 2006 | Southend(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 3 Dec 2005 | Sheffield United(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 23 Sept 2005 | Luton(A) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | — | Championship |
| 19 Mar 2005 | Colchester(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | 🟨 2 | League One |
| 21 Aug 2004 | Huddersfield(H) | 1 - 0 | WIN | — | League One |
| 18 Sept 2002 | Coventry(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | 🟨 1 | Championship |
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Sheffield Weds
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.