P TaylorvsReading
Analysis based on 15 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When P Taylor officiates Reading matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 15 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Reading achieves a 46.7% win rate under P Taylor, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 1.7 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
📊 NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS
Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
15 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Mar 2010 | Bristol City(H) | 2 - 0 | WIN | 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 16 Sept 2009 | Cardiff(H) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | — | Championship |
| 17 Mar 2009 | Doncaster(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 10 Dec 2005 | Brighton(H) | 5 - 1 | WIN | 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 6 Aug 2005 | Plymouth(H) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 11 Dec 2004 | Leicester(A) | 2 - 0 | WIN | 🟨 3 | Championship |
| 10 Aug 2004 | West Ham(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | — | Championship |
| 20 Mar 2004 | Sunderland(H) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 26 Dec 2003 | Wimbledon(H) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | — | Championship |
| 15 Apr 2003 | Preston(H) | 5 - 1 | WIN | 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 26 Dec 2002 | Coventry(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | 🟨 3 | Championship |
| 27 Aug 2002 | Burnley(H) | 3 - 0 | WIN | — | Championship |
| 26 Jan 2002 | Colchester(H) | 3 - 0 | WIN | 🟨 2 | League One |
| 13 Oct 2001 | Swindon(H) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | 🟨 1 | League One |
| 29 Aug 2000 | Stoke(H) | 3 - 3 | DRAW | 🟨 3 | League One |
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Reading
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.