πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

P RobinsonvsStockport

Analysis based on 6 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

0
Wins
3
Draws
3
Losses

When P Robinson officiates Stockport matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 6 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Stockport achieves a 0% win rate under P Robinson, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 45.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

🚨STRONG BIAS DETECTED

🚨 STRONG BIAS DETECTED

This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.

Bias Score
-45.0%
Matches Analyzed
6
⚠️

Notable Negative Pattern

With a bias score of -45.0%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 6 matches, Stockport has won 45 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when P Robinson is appointed.

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level-45.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

6 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
29 Apr 2006Barnet(A)0 - 0DRAW
β€”
League Two
21 Jan 2006Rushden & D(H)2 - 2DRAW
🟨 1
League Two
8 Oct 2005Leyton Orient(H)1 - 1DRAW
🟨 2
League Two
22 Feb 2005Chesterfield(H)1 - 2LOSS
🟨 1
League One
11 Dec 2004Hartlepool(A)1 - 3LOSS
🟨 4
League One
24 Jan 2004Plymouth(H)0 - 2LOSS
🟨 2
League One

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)0.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-45.0%

Cards for Stockport

🟨 Yellows / Game1.67
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.33
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.