P MillervsMacclesfield
Analysis based on 6 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When P Miller officiates Macclesfield matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 6 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Macclesfield achieves a 16.7% win rate under P Miller, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 28.3 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
π¨ STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -28.3%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 6 matches, Macclesfield has won 28 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when P Miller is appointed.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
6 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2010 | Wycombe(A) | 2 - 1 | WIN | π¨ 2 | League Two |
| 1 May 2010 | Darlington(H) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | β | League Two |
| 23 Jan 2010 | Port Vale(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 20 Dec 2008 | Dag and Red(H) | 0 - 4 | LOSS | π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 3 Mar 2007 | Wycombe(A) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | π¨ 4π₯ 1 | League Two |
| 4 Feb 2006 | Mansfield(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | β | League Two |
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Macclesfield
Cards for Opponents
Betting Outlook
TIPSTER INSIGHTRED CARD RISK
Red card frequency: 0.17 per game
Higher than average dismissal rate in this matchup.
β οΈ This is statistical analysis, not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.