🧑‍⚖️ Referee Analysis

P JoslinvsHull

Analysis based on 5 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

3
Wins
0
Draws
2
Losses

When P Joslin officiates Hull matches, the statistics reveal a favorable pattern. Based on 5 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Hull achieves a 60% win rate under P Joslin, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 15.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

FAVORABLE RECORD

✅ FAVORABLE RECORD

This team has an above-average win rate when this referee officiates.

Bias Score
+15.0%
Matches Analyzed
5

Favorable Pattern Detected

With a bias score of +15.0%, Hull has historically performed 15 percentage points better under P Joslin than their average. This favorable pattern across 5 matches could be valuable information for match predictions and betting strategies.

The Bias Meter™

Bias Level+15.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

5 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
9 Apr 2007Wolves(A)1 - 3LOSS
🟨 3
Championship
30 Jan 2007Leeds(H)1 - 2LOSS
🟨 1
Championship
31 Oct 2006Southend(A)3 - 2WIN
🟥 1
Championship
20 Aug 2005Brighton(H)2 - 0WIN
Championship
25 Aug 2003Cambridge(A)2 - 0WIN
🟨 1
League Two

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)60.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score+15.0%

Cards for Hull

🟨 Yellows / Game1.00
🟥 Reds / Game0.20

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game2.20
🟥 Opp Reds / Game0.00
💰

Betting Outlook

TIPSTER INSIGHT
🟥

RED CARD RISK

Red card frequency: 0.2 per game

Higher than average dismissal rate in this matchup.

⚠️ This is statistical analysis, not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.