πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

O LangfordvsYork

Analysis based on 8 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

2
Wins
2
Draws
4
Losses

When O Langford officiates York matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 8 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows York achieves a 25% win rate under O Langford, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 20.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

🚨STRONG BIAS DETECTED

🚨 STRONG BIAS DETECTED

This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.

Bias Score
-20.0%
Matches Analyzed
8
⚠️

Notable Negative Pattern

With a bias score of -20.0%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 8 matches, York has won 20 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when O Langford is appointed.

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level-20.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

8 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
1 Mar 2016Oxford(A)0 - 4LOSS
β€”
League Two
8 Aug 2015Wycombe(A)0 - 3LOSS
🟨 1
League Two
10 Jan 2015Wycombe(A)0 - 1LOSS
🟨 1
League Two
18 Apr 2014Oxford(A)1 - 0WIN
🟨 3
League Two
21 Oct 2007Torquay(H)0 - 1LOSS
🟨 1
EC
20 Aug 2007Exeter(A)1 - 1DRAW
🟨 1
EC
1 Apr 2006Burton(A)0 - 0DRAW
🟨 2
EC
18 Feb 2006Exeter(A)3 - 1WIN
🟨 1
EC

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)25.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-20.0%

Cards for York

🟨 Yellows / Game1.25
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.75
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.