🧑‍⚖️ Referee Analysis

O LangfordvsRochdale

Analysis based on 9 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

6
Wins
1
Draws
2
Losses

When O Langford officiates Rochdale matches, the statistics reveal a significantly positive pattern. Based on 9 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Rochdale achieves a 66.7% win rate under O Langford, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 21.7 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

FAVORABLE RECORD

✅ FAVORABLE RECORD

This team has an above-average win rate when this referee officiates.

Bias Score
+21.7%
Matches Analyzed
9

Favorable Pattern Detected

With a bias score of +21.7%, Rochdale has historically performed 22 percentage points better under O Langford than their average. This favorable pattern across 9 matches could be valuable information for match predictions and betting strategies.

The Bias Meter™

Bias Level+21.7%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

9 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
5 Mar 2016Coventry(A)1 - 0WIN
🟨 1
League One
10 Oct 2015Sheffield United(A)2 - 3LOSS
🟨 1
League One
7 Mar 2015Colchester(H)2 - 1WIN
🟨 1
League One
26 Apr 2014Cheltenham(H)2 - 0WIN
League Two
8 Feb 2014AFC Wimbledon(A)3 - 0WIN
League Two
19 Nov 2011Preston(A)1 - 0WIN
🟨 1
League One
13 Apr 2010Darlington(H)0 - 1LOSS
League Two
26 Dec 2009Crewe(A)2 - 2DRAW
🟨 1
League Two
16 Aug 2008Barnet(H)3 - 1WIN
🟨 1
League Two

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)66.7%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score+21.7%

Cards for Rochdale

🟨 Yellows / Game0.67
🟥 Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game0.44
🟥 Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.