M ThorpevsLeyton Orient
Analysis based on 9 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When M Thorpe officiates Leyton Orient matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 9 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Leyton Orient achieves a 22.2% win rate under M Thorpe, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 22.8 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
π¨ STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -22.8%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 9 matches, Leyton Orient has won 23 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when M Thorpe is appointed.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
9 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2008 | Peterboro(A) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | π¨ 1 | League One |
| 19 Apr 2008 | Doncaster(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | β | League One |
| 20 Oct 2007 | Port Vale(H) | 3 - 1 | WIN | π¨ 2 | League One |
| 23 Sept 2006 | Rotherham(H) | 2 - 3 | LOSS | π¨ 2 | League One |
| 6 Aug 2005 | Macclesfield(H) | 2 - 1 | WIN | π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 22 Jan 2005 | Rushden & D(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 16 Mar 2004 | Hull(A) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | π¨ 2 | League Two |
| 15 Mar 2003 | Bristol Rvs(H) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | β | League Two |
| 26 Aug 2002 | Kidderminster(H) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | π¨ 2 | League Two |
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Leyton Orient
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.