πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

M JonesvsWycombe

Analysis based on 7 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

1
Wins
2
Draws
4
Losses

When M Jones officiates Wycombe matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Wycombe achieves a 14.3% win rate under M Jones, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 30.7 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

🚨STRONG BIAS DETECTED

🚨 STRONG BIAS DETECTED

This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.

Bias Score
-30.7%
Matches Analyzed
7
⚠️

Notable Negative Pattern

With a bias score of -30.7%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 7 matches, Wycombe has won 31 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when M Jones is appointed.

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level-30.7%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

7 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
17 Feb 2007Bury(A)4 - 0WIN
🟨 2
League Two
17 Dec 2005Bury(A)1 - 2LOSS
🟨 3
League Two
5 Feb 2005Boston(H)1 - 2LOSS
β€”
League Two
13 Sept 2003QPR(A)0 - 0DRAW
🟨 2
League One
22 Mar 2003Chesterfield(A)0 - 4LOSS
β€”
League One
13 Oct 2001Bournemouth(H)1 - 1DRAW
β€”
League One
17 Oct 2000Oldham(A)0 - 2LOSS
🟨 2
League One

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)14.3%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-30.7%

Cards for Wycombe

🟨 Yellows / Game1.29
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game2.43
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.