M JonesvsPreston
Analysis based on 15 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When M Jones officiates Preston matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 15 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Preston achieves a 40% win rate under M Jones, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 5.0 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
📊 NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS
Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
15 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Feb 2010 | Blackpool(H) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 7 Feb 2009 | Reading(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | 🟨 3 | Championship |
| 1 Mar 2008 | Crystal Palace(H) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | 🟨 3 | Championship |
| 18 Aug 2007 | West Brom(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 2 Dec 2006 | Luton(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 14 Oct 2006 | Sunderland(H) | 4 - 1 | WIN | 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 26 Nov 2005 | Watford(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 10 Sept 2005 | Millwall(A) | 2 - 1 | WIN | 🟨 3 | Championship |
| 19 Mar 2005 | Watford(A) | 2 - 0 | WIN | 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 27 Nov 2004 | Derby(H) | 3 - 0 | WIN | 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 2 Mar 2004 | Reading(H) | 2 - 1 | WIN | 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 5 Apr 2003 | Coventry(H) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 1 Jan 2003 | Stoke(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | 🟨 3 | Championship |
| 12 Jan 2002 | Walsall(A) | 2 - 1 | WIN | 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 14 Apr 2001 | Nott'm Forest(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | — | Championship |
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Preston
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.