πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

M JonesvsNott'm Forest

Analysis based on 13 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

6
Wins
3
Draws
4
Losses

When M Jones officiates Nott'm Forest matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 13 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Nott'm Forest achieves a 46.2% win rate under M Jones, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 1.2 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

πŸ“ŠNO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

πŸ“Š NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.

Bias Score
+1.2%
Matches Analyzed
13

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level+1.2%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

13 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
18 Oct 2014Cardiff(A)1 - 2LOSS
🟨 3
Championship
19 Apr 2014Birmingham(H)1 - 0WIN
🟨 2
Championship
6 Mar 2012Doncaster(H)1 - 2LOSS
β€”
Championship
13 Apr 2009Sheffield United(A)0 - 0DRAW
🟨 3πŸŸ₯ 1
Championship
15 Sept 2007Port Vale(A)2 - 0WIN
🟨 1
League One
10 Mar 2007Scunthorpe(A)1 - 1DRAW
🟨 3
League One
28 Oct 2006Cheltenham(A)2 - 0WIN
🟨 2
League One
1 Jan 2005Stoke(H)1 - 0WIN
🟨 2
Championship
15 Apr 2003Sheffield United(A)0 - 1LOSS
🟨 3
Championship
30 Mar 2002Man City(A)0 - 3LOSS
β€”
Championship
20 Sept 2001Bradford(H)1 - 0WIN
🟨 2
Championship
14 Apr 2001Preston(A)1 - 1DRAW
🟨 1
Championship
9 Dec 2000Portsmouth(H)2 - 0WIN
β€”
Championship

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)46.2%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score+1.2%

Cards for Nott'm Forest

🟨 Yellows / Game1.69
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.08

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.62
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.31

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.