πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis

M JonesvsBlackpool

Analysis based on 14 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

5
Wins
5
Draws
4
Losses

When M Jones officiates Blackpool matches, the statistics reveal no significant bias pattern. Based on 14 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Blackpool achieves a 35.7% win rate under M Jones, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 9.3 percentage point difference falls within normal statistical variance. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

πŸ“ŠNO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

πŸ“Š NO SIGNIFICANT BIAS

Results under this referee fall within normal statistical variance.

Bias Score
-9.3%
Matches Analyzed
14

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level-9.3%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

14 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
3 Oct 2010Liverpool(A)2 - 1WIN
🟨 1
Premier League
21 Aug 2010Arsenal(A)0 - 6LOSS
πŸŸ₯ 1
Premier League
13 Feb 2010Preston(A)0 - 0DRAW
🟨 1
Championship
6 Dec 2008Charlton(H)2 - 0WIN
🟨 1
Championship
16 Sept 2006Oldham(H)2 - 2DRAW
🟨 4
League One
18 Mar 2006Port Vale(H)1 - 0WIN
β€”
League One
21 Jan 2006Bristol City(H)1 - 1DRAW
🟨 2
League One
13 Nov 2005Scunthorpe(H)5 - 2WIN
🟨 4
League One
9 Apr 2005Peterboro(H)0 - 1LOSS
🟨 1
League One
25 Aug 2003Barnsley(H)0 - 2LOSS
🟨 1
League One
21 Apr 2003Mansfield(H)3 - 3DRAW
🟨 1
League One
26 Dec 2002Oldham(A)1 - 1DRAW
🟨 3
League One
5 May 2001Darlington(A)3 - 1WIN
🟨 2
League Two
26 Dec 2000Halifax(H)0 - 1LOSS
🟨 1
League Two

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)35.7%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-9.3%

Cards for Blackpool

🟨 Yellows / Game1.57
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.07

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game0.86
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.07

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.