🧑‍⚖️ Referee Analysis

M HaywoodvsWalsall

Analysis based on 10 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

6
Wins
2
Draws
2
Losses

When M Haywood officiates Walsall matches, the statistics reveal a favorable pattern. Based on 10 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Walsall achieves a 60% win rate under M Haywood, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 15.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

FAVORABLE RECORD

✅ FAVORABLE RECORD

This team has an above-average win rate when this referee officiates.

Bias Score
+15.0%
Matches Analyzed
10

Favorable Pattern Detected

With a bias score of +15.0%, Walsall has historically performed 15 percentage points better under M Haywood than their average. This favorable pattern across 10 matches could be valuable information for match predictions and betting strategies.

The Bias Meter™

Bias Level+15.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

10 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
18 Feb 2017Peterboro(H)2 - 0WIN
🟨 4
League One
16 Jan 2016Bury(A)3 - 2WIN
League One
22 Nov 2014Fleetwood Town(A)1 - 0WIN
League One
24 Aug 2013Brentford(A)0 - 1LOSS
🟨 1
League One
31 Mar 2012Rochdale(A)3 - 3DRAW
League One
26 Jan 2010Norwich(H)1 - 2LOSS
🟨 1
League One
12 Sept 2009Tranmere(A)3 - 2WIN
🟨 3
League One
27 Sept 2008Carlisle(H)2 - 1WIN
League One
3 Nov 2007Cheltenham(H)2 - 0WIN
🟨 1
League One
6 Oct 2006Chester(A)0 - 0DRAW
🟨 1
League Two

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)60.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score+15.0%

Cards for Walsall

🟨 Yellows / Game1.10
🟥 Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game0.90
🟥 Opp Reds / Game0.10

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.