M HaywoodvsOldham
Analysis based on 10 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When M Haywood officiates Oldham matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 10 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Oldham achieves a 10% win rate under M Haywood, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 35.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
🚨 STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -35.0%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 10 matches, Oldham has won 35 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when M Haywood is appointed.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
10 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 Jan 2017 | Shrewsbury(A) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | 🟨 3 | League One |
| 24 Sept 2016 | Swindon(H) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | 🟨 3 | League One |
| 28 Feb 2015 | Preston(H) | 0 - 4 | LOSS | — | League One |
| 22 Oct 2013 | Wolves(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | 🟨 1 | League One |
| 15 Feb 2011 | Carlisle(H) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | 🟨 1 | League One |
| 22 Aug 2009 | Swindon(H) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | 🟨 1 | League One |
| 3 Oct 2008 | Stockport(A) | 1 - 3 | LOSS | — | League One |
| 9 Feb 2008 | Gillingham(H) | 2 - 1 | WIN | — | League One |
| 30 Oct 2007 | Nott'm Forest(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | — | League One |
| 21 Apr 2007 | Crewe(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | 🟨 3 | League One |
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Oldham
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.