πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

M HaywoodvsLeicester

Analysis based on 6 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

1
Wins
4
Draws
1
Losses

When M Haywood officiates Leicester matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 6 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Leicester achieves a 16.7% win rate under M Haywood, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 28.3 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

🚨STRONG BIAS DETECTED

🚨 STRONG BIAS DETECTED

This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.

Bias Score
-28.3%
Matches Analyzed
6
⚠️

Notable Negative Pattern

With a bias score of -28.3%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 6 matches, Leicester has won 28 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when M Haywood is appointed.

The Bias Meterβ„’

Bias Level-28.3%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

6 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
6 Mar 2012Bristol City(A)2 - 3LOSS
🟨 1
Championship
25 Sept 2011Cardiff(A)0 - 0DRAW
🟨 3
Championship
10 Jan 2010Ipswich(H)1 - 1DRAW
β€”
Championship
29 Sept 2009Middlesbrough(A)1 - 0WIN
🟨 1
Championship
24 Apr 2009Scunthorpe(H)2 - 2DRAW
🟨 3
League One
4 Dec 2007Burnley(A)1 - 1DRAW
β€”
Championship

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)16.7%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-28.3%

Cards for Leicester

🟨 Yellows / Game1.33
πŸŸ₯ Reds / Game0.00

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game0.83
πŸŸ₯ Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.