🧑‍⚖️ Referee Analysis

M DiciccovsStockport

Analysis based on 5 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

4
Wins
1
Draws
0
Losses

When M Dicicco officiates Stockport matches, the statistics reveal a significantly positive pattern. Based on 5 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Stockport achieves a 80% win rate under M Dicicco, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 35.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

FAVORABLE RECORD

✅ FAVORABLE RECORD

This team has an above-average win rate when this referee officiates.

Bias Score
+35.0%
Matches Analyzed
5

Favorable Pattern Detected

With a bias score of +35.0%, Stockport has historically performed 35 percentage points better under M Dicicco than their average. This favorable pattern across 5 matches could be valuable information for match predictions and betting strategies.

The Bias Meter™

Bias Level+35.0%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

5 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
15 May 2022Halifax(H)2 - 0WIN
🟨 1
EC
19 Feb 2022Woking(H)1 - 0WIN
🟨 2🟥 1
EC
11 Jan 2022Altrincham(A)4 - 1WIN
🟨 2
EC
16 Mar 2021Barnet(H)2 - 1WIN
🟨 3
EC
27 Oct 2020Solihull(H)0 - 0DRAW
🟨 4
EC

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)80.0%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score+35.0%

Cards for Stockport

🟨 Yellows / Game2.40
🟥 Reds / Game0.20

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.60
🟥 Opp Reds / Game0.00
💰

Betting Outlook

TIPSTER INSIGHT
🟥

RED CARD RISK

Red card frequency: 0.2 per game

Higher than average dismissal rate in this matchup.

⚠️ This is statistical analysis, not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.