L SwabeyvsCrewe
Analysis based on 10 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When L Swabey officiates Crewe matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 10 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Crewe achieves a 20% win rate under L Swabey, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 25.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
🚨 STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -25.0%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 10 matches, Crewe has won 25 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when L Swabey is appointed.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
10 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Jan 2025 | Swindon(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | 🟨 1 | League Two |
| 30 Sept 2023 | Wrexham(A) | 3 - 3 | DRAW | 🟨 4 | League Two |
| 25 Oct 2022 | AFC Wimbledon(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | 🟨 5 | League Two |
| 11 Dec 2021 | Sheffield Weds(H) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | 🟨 1 | League One |
| 3 Mar 2020 | Exeter(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | 🟨 1 | League Two |
| 1 Feb 2020 | Walsall(A) | 2 - 1 | WIN | — | League Two |
| 28 Sept 2019 | Cheltenham(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | 🟨 3🟥 1 | League Two |
| 30 Mar 2018 | Barnet(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | — | League Two |
| 17 Apr 2017 | Yeovil(A) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | 🟨 1 | League Two |
| 30 Apr 2016 | Doncaster(H) | 3 - 1 | WIN | — | League One |
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Crewe
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.