K HillvsRochdale
Analysis based on 10 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When K Hill officiates Rochdale matches, the statistics reveal a severe negative pattern. Based on 10 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Rochdale achieves a 0% win rate under K Hill, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 45.0 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
π¨ STRONG BIAS DETECTED
This referee has a significantly negative history with this team. Win rate is severely below average.
Notable Negative Pattern
With a bias score of -45.0%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 10 matches, Rochdale has won 45 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when K Hill is appointed.
The Bias Meterβ’
Match History
10 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2015 | Chesterfield(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | π¨ 1 | League One |
| 14 Feb 2015 | Peterboro(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | π¨ 2 | League One |
| 18 Sept 2010 | Milton Keynes Dons(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | π¨ 3 | League One |
| 13 Jan 2007 | Bristol Rvs(H) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | π¨ 2 | League Two |
| 19 Aug 2006 | Notts County(H) | 0 - 1 | LOSS | π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 21 Mar 2006 | Grimsby(H) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 30 Mar 2004 | Doncaster(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | π¨ 4 | League Two |
| 3 May 2003 | Macclesfield(A) | 2 - 3 | LOSS | π¨ 2 | League Two |
| 22 Mar 2003 | Exeter(A) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | π¨ 1 | League Two |
| 21 Sept 2002 | Kidderminster(A) | 0 - 0 | DRAW | π¨ 1 | League Two |
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Rochdale
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.