🧑‍⚖️ Referee Analysis⚠️ BIAS DETECTED

J AdcockvsCardiff

Analysis based on 7 matches since 2000

* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.

2
Wins
2
Draws
3
Losses

When J Adcock officiates Cardiff matches, the statistics reveal a notable negative pattern. Based on 7 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Cardiff achieves a 28.6% win rate under J Adcock, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This negative 16.4 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.

⚠️POTENTIAL BIAS

⚠️ POTENTIAL BIAS DETECTED

This team performs notably worse under this referee compared to their overall average.

Bias Score
-16.4%
Matches Analyzed
7
⚠️

Notable Negative Pattern

With a bias score of -16.4%, this ranks among the more significant negative patterns in our database. Over 7 matches, Cardiff has won 16 percentage points fewer games than expected. For bettors and fantasy managers, this historical trend suggests extra caution when J Adcock is appointed.

The Bias Meter™

Bias Level-16.4%
Bias AgainstNeutralFavorable

Match History

7 matches under this referee

DateOpponentScoreResultCardsDivision
28 Jan 2017Reading(A)1 - 2LOSS
🟨 1
Championship
10 Dec 2016Ipswich(A)1 - 1DRAW
🟨 4🟥 1
Championship
19 Nov 2016Huddersfield(H)3 - 2WIN
🟨 2
Championship
3 Mar 2015Rotherham(A)3 - 1WIN
Championship
17 Jan 2015Norwich(A)2 - 3LOSS
🟨 3
Championship
13 Dec 2014Bournemouth(A)3 - 5LOSS
Championship
30 Aug 2014Fulham(A)1 - 1DRAW
🟨 1
Championship

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Statistics

Win Rate (Under Ref)28.6%
Baseline Win Rate45%
Bias Score-16.4%

Cards for Cardiff

🟨 Yellows / Game1.57
🟥 Reds / Game0.14

Cards for Opponents

🟨 Opp Yellows / Game1.43
🟥 Opp Reds / Game0.00

Share This Analysis

Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.