G WardvsLeeds
Analysis based on 11 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When G Ward officiates Leeds matches, the statistics reveal a favorable pattern. Based on 11 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Leeds achieves a 63.6% win rate under G Ward, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 18.6 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
✅ FAVORABLE RECORD
This team has an above-average win rate when this referee officiates.
Favorable Pattern Detected
With a bias score of +18.6%, Leeds has historically performed 19 percentage points better under G Ward than their average. This favorable pattern across 11 matches could be valuable information for match predictions and betting strategies.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
11 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 Sept 2024 | Coventry(H) | 3 - 0 | WIN | 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 31 Aug 2024 | Hull(H) | 2 - 0 | WIN | 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 26 Feb 2020 | Middlesbrough(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | — | Championship |
| 7 Dec 2019 | Huddersfield(A) | 2 - 0 | WIN | 🟨 3 | Championship |
| 9 Nov 2019 | Blackburn(H) | 2 - 1 | WIN | 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 5 May 2019 | Ipswich(A) | 2 - 3 | LOSS | 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 12 Mar 2019 | Reading(A) | 3 - 0 | WIN | 🟨 3 | Championship |
| 19 Jan 2019 | Stoke(A) | 1 - 2 | LOSS | 🟨 2🟥 1 | Championship |
| 20 Dec 2015 | Preston(H) | 1 - 0 | WIN | 🟨 1 | Championship |
| 19 Aug 2015 | Bristol City(A) | 2 - 2 | DRAW | 🟨 5 | Championship |
| 8 Apr 2014 | Watford(A) | 0 - 3 | LOSS | 🟨 2 | Championship |
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Leeds
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.