G ScottvsWolves
Analysis based on 11 matches since 2000
* Note: Detailed card statistics for matches before 2005 may be incomplete.
When G Scott officiates Wolves matches, the statistics reveal a favorable pattern. Based on 11 matches spanning multiple seasons, our comprehensive analysis shows Wolves achieves a 63.6% win rate under G Scott, compared to the 45% baseline expected for teams at this level. This positive 18.6 percentage point difference suggests a meaningful pattern worth examining. The data includes detailed card statistics, match outcomes, and historical trends to provide football fans, bettors, and analysts with evidence-based insights into this referee-team dynamic.
✅ FAVORABLE RECORD
This team has an above-average win rate when this referee officiates.
Favorable Pattern Detected
With a bias score of +18.6%, Wolves has historically performed 19 percentage points better under G Scott than their average. This favorable pattern across 11 matches could be valuable information for match predictions and betting strategies.
The Bias Meter™
Match History
11 matches under this referee
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Cards | Division |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2022 | Brighton(H) | 2 - 3 | LOSS | 🟨 2🟥 1 | Premier League |
| 6 Nov 2021 | Crystal Palace(A) | 0 - 2 | LOSS | 🟨 1 | Premier League |
| 2 Oct 2021 | Newcastle(H) | 2 - 1 | WIN | — | Premier League |
| 14 Feb 2021 | Southampton(A) | 2 - 1 | WIN | 🟨 2 | Premier League |
| 14 Sept 2019 | Chelsea(H) | 2 - 5 | LOSS | 🟨 1 | Premier League |
| 11 Feb 2019 | Newcastle(H) | 1 - 1 | DRAW | 🟨 1 | Premier League |
| 17 Dec 2016 | Nott'm Forest(A) | 2 - 0 | WIN | 🟨 3 | Championship |
| 27 Feb 2016 | Derby(H) | 2 - 1 | WIN | 🟨 4 | Championship |
| 26 Dec 2014 | Watford(A) | 1 - 0 | WIN | 🟨 2 | Championship |
| 26 Nov 2013 | Tranmere(H) | 2 - 0 | WIN | — | League One |
| 31 Aug 2013 | Port Vale(A) | 3 - 1 | WIN | 🟨 1 | League One |
Frequently Asked Questions
Detailed Statistics
Cards for Wolves
Cards for Opponents
Share This Analysis
Think your mates need to see this? Share the evidence.